What
are rangelands?
Range is an extensive area of level, rolling, broken or mountainous
land, usually not suitable for cultivation. Rangelands in good,
relatively undisturbed, condition typically support native grasses,
forbs and sparse woody brush such as sagebrush or juniper. In
the Pacific Northwest rangelands can include savannahs, grasslands,
steppe, wetlands and forested areas. Rangelands may be publicly
or privately owned, fenced or unfenced, and supporting a wide
variety of plant communities depending upon their evolutionary
histories and past use patterns.
Does rangeland concern me?
Rangeland is highly important as a source of water, wildlife,
and many forms of recreation as well as providing forage for
livestock. The promotion of conservation and maintenance of
rangelands for future use is just as important for the person
not directly involved in rangeland use as it is for the person
operating and living on the range. Our rangeland resources are
some of our most valuable natural resources.
A history…
The vegetation in the rangelands of the Pacific Northwest coevolved
with small herds of large herbivores such as deer and elk and
sparse bison but not with large herds of bison, as in the Midwest.
Annual precipitation west of the Rockies occurs primarily in
the autumn/winter rather than in the early summer, as is the
case east of the Rockies. Due, in part, to this, the Intermountain
region is dominated by C3 grasses rather than a mixture of C3
and C4 grasses that benefited the large number of bison in the
Midwest. The Intermountain region did not experience large herds
of large grazers prior to Euro-American settlement. There are
fewer decomposers of herbivore dung in the Intermountain region
than in the Midwest. The introduction of cattle did not greatly
alter the Midwest since the impacts on the land created by cattle
are similar to those created by large numbers of bison. In the
Intermountain region cattle did have a great effect, helping
non-native plants invade both seral and climax communities.
Heavy grazing caused native plants to grow more prostrate. Intermountain
caespitose plant species had not evolved extensive defenses
to heavy grazing as had Midwest species, which included a large
number of rhizomatous species and extravaginal tillering structure
in many species. Cryptograms, which are highly susceptible to
grazing, are very common in the Intermountain region but not
in the Midwest. (Mack
and Thompson, 1982)
Rangeland has played a major role in the history of the western
United States since European-American settlement. The Spaniard,
Coronado, brought the first cattle, sheep and horses into what
is now the United States in 1540. Horses soon escaped captivity
or were left behind by the conquistadors, and their numbers
increased. The Native Americans learned how to use the horse
from the Spaniards and Mexicans. Wild horses became common on
our western ranges during the 1800’s. In fact, in some areas
horses were largely responsible for destruction of the original
range vegetation.
Cattle and sheep herding became major components of the Euro-American
settlement of the western U.S. Livestock raising provided a
way for early white settlers to make a living from land not
particularly amenable to farming. Running cattle and/or sheep
came to be a major component of a distinctly western U.S. culture,
providing a part of the foundation of a whole set of values
that remains with us today. Cattle drives, from areas where
the cattle were raised to areas where they were needed for food
or for breeding stock, became part of our western tradition.
Cattle on the trail drives averaged 15 to 20 miles per day and
gained weight from eating the abundant grasses along the trail.
Some of the most famous trails were the Chisholm, Shawnee, Dodge
City, Sedalia, Goodnight, California and National. The discovery
of gold and extension of railroads into the West led to more
livestock ranching. Originally, most of the big cattle drives
were to the railroads. Eventually, transportation provided by
the railroad put an end to these cattle drives.
Thousands of cattle died on the Great Plains range during the
severe cold winter of 1885 and 1886. The next year, the Great
Plains had a severe drought, cutting cattle numbers further.
Falling prices reduced rancher income and cattle numbers still
more. Following the temporary decline of cattle numbers, the
numbers of sheep increased rapidly. Depletion of range occurred
as cattle numbers again increased. “Range Wars” were fought
between cattle and sheep producers.
Grazing was the primary use made of public lands in the west
for many years. As “America moved west” large portions of the
western range were homesteaded, plowed, and planted to crops.
The barbed wire fence did much to change the open range from
free use to controlled access. Rangelands have decreased in
area, as well as in forage production. Military reservations,
cities, towns, airports, mining operations, recreational areas,
protected areas and highways are replacing rangeland or influencing
its management. As the number of people living in our country
increases, so also does the use of our rangelands increase.
People now have more leisure time for hunting, fishing, and
other forms of recreation. The demand for meat and other animal
products in decreasing, affecting the way the public views the
use of public rangelands for livestock foraging. The availability
of water for irrigation, home use, industry, and power is becoming
more critical each year. These things have brought about the
need for a closer look at the entire rangeland resource. Stock
producers, federal and state agencies, and the public at large,
have a real responsibility to plan cooperatively for proper
rangeland management.
The poor condition of some of our rangelands has contributed
to widespread floods, which have resulted in a loss of life
and property. Much valuable water and soil has been lost due
to flooding and erosion of degraded land. Many important reservoirs
and hydroelectric developments have been silted in unnecessarily
and their useful life shortened. Degradation to riparian areas
is of special concern. Riparian areas are highly productive
and highly sensitive areas. They are essential to healthy fisheries,
stable watersheds – producing a reliable source of water for
various human and ecological uses, wildlife habitat and healthy
rangelands. Livestock, especially cattle, if improperly managed,
tend to congregate in riparian areas and to cause extensive
damage such as making the stream channel wider and shallower,
causing siltation and decreasing vegetative cover.
While these factors are serious, there is much to be optimistic
about. Many ranchers know how to take care of their range –
and have been or are so doing. Government land-managing agencies
have kept much of the public rangeland in good, healthy condition.
Range managers have been and continue to employ range improvement
practices such as fire control, prescribed burning, seeding
and grazing systems. As more research is done and more experience
and knowledge gained these practices have been and continue
to be modified. For example, early extensive fire control practices,
attempting to preserve forage for stock, led to a build up of
plant fuel and uncontrollable wildfires; today we know that
some rangelands evolved with and require occasional fire so
some natural fires are allowed to burn and sometimes prescribed
burns are employed. Each of these range improvement practices
is only appropriate in certain situations under certain conditions.
They can assist greatly in range management when used properly
but success depends upon a good understanding of the conditions,
process and expected results of each of these practices.
Most rangelands in the United States are grazed by wildlife,
such as deer and elk, as well as by livestock. To make wildlife
management successful, it is necessary that our ranges be managed
in a way that directly targets wildlife species and their needs.
Rangeland management for wildlife and livestock is possible
but good management for one is not necessarily good management
for the other. If the forage resources or feed supplies are
managed carefully, wildlife and livestock can use the same range
successfully. Since they all eat forage, there may be some competition
between these animals. However, in many cases, proper use by
each type of animal may help the range from the standpoint of
the others.
The fact that we all have a stake in our range resource is becoming
nationally recognized. The livestock growers, the land managers,
hunters, recreationists and conservationists are becoming aware
of the importance of a healthy rangeland. Generally, where desire
to do something about the range resource exists, technical information
is available to make it possible. The general public is recognizing
the value of our rangelands; this is especially evident in politically
and emotionally charged issues such as the effects of range
and watershed management on salmon in the Pacific Northwest.
The multiple uses of much of our rangeland are bringing the
value of the range into focus for many people who had not previously
given it much consideration.
How much range do we have?
There are approximately 399 million acres of rangeland, of which
259 million acres are federally owned, in the United States.
Most of it is in the 17 western states. The rangeland of the
westernmost 8 states is approximately 130 million acres. Many
of the federal forestlands are also grazed by either domestic
livestock or wildlife. Rangelands are important due, in part,
to their tremendous size. Though the rangeland is far removed
in most instances from the centers of population, the condition
and productivity of the range influences every American citizen.
What is the nature and extent of our rangeland resource? What
is required for the maintenance of ecological services and how
may each of us take part in proper rangeland management. (To
view maps of land cover and land use see the National
Biological Information Infrastructure Pacific Northwest Node
and click on "Visit our forest and fire interactive
mapping application")